Tag Archives: war

RT: US wouldn’t rescue allies in nuclear war – Putin

Moscow hopes Western escalation won’t lead to a nuclear exchange with “infinite” casualties

US wouldn’t rescue allies in nuclear war – Putin

©  Sputnik / Ivan Sekretarev

Should the European NATO members manage to provoke Moscow into a nuclear response, the Americans might stay on the sidelines, Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested.

Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) on Friday, Putin was asked about the increasingly belligerent rhetoric from some European capitals, which moderator Sergey Karaganov compared to the baying of hyenas.

“The Europeans have to think: if those with whom we exchange such [nuclear] blows are obliterated, would the Americans get involved in such an exchange, on the level of strategic weapons, or not? I very much doubt it,” Putin said in response.

The Russian president explained that, while the US and Russia both have well-developed early warning systems to detect incoming missiles, the European members of NATO do not. “In this sense, they are more or less defenseless,” he said.

Moreover, Russia’s tactical nuclear weapons are “three to four times more powerful than the bombs the Americans used against Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” Putin said. “We have many times more of them – both on the European continent, and even if the Americans bring theirs over from the US – we still have many times more.”

Any such war would have “infinite casualties,” the Russian president warned.

While not ruling out changes to Russia’s nuclear doctrine, Putin reminded the audience that it currently only allows the use of atomic weapons in case of threats to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country, which is presently not the case. 

Nor has Moscow ever brandished nuclear weapons in the Ukraine conflict, that being a malicious fabrication of some Western politicians, he added.

READ MORE: US may expand nuclear arsenal – Biden aide

There is no need to even bring up nuclear escalation when the Russian military and defense industry are effective and far more capable than its adversaries when it comes to armor and aviation, Putin said.

The US and its allies have funneled weapons, ammunition and equipment to Ukraine over the past two years, while insisting they wanted to inflict “a strategic defeat” on Russia – but weren’t a party to the conflict. In recent weeks, Washington, London and some other NATO members announced they were lifting restrictions on Kiev’s use of their weapons against Russia, prompting calls for Moscow to retaliate

Citing the need to send the West a message, last month the Kremlin ordered the military district that borders Ukraine to carry out drills in deploying non-strategic nuclear weapons.

D/C: Putin is definitely trying to dial up the “scary factor of nuclear weapons” . Most probably to disturb current elections around the world and create a very nasty fear factor. Putin’s media chess move number three!!

The Guardian: Russia nuclear-powered submarine to visit Cuba amid rising tensions with US

Russian sub – joined by three other naval vessels – will not be carrying nuclear weapons, authorities in Havana said as they announced the visit

Guardian staff and agenciesFri 7 Jun 2024 00.44 BSTLast modified on Fri 7 Jun 2024 10.50 BST

A Russian nuclear-powered submarine – which will not be carrying nuclear weapons – will visit Havana next week, Cuba’s communist authorities have announced, amid rising tensions with the US over the war in Ukraine.

The nuclear submarine Kazan and three other Russian naval vessels, including the missile frigate Admiral Gorshkov, an oil tanker and a salvage tug, will dock in the Cuban capital from 12-17 June, Cuba’s ministry of the revolutionary armed forces said in a statement.

“None of the vessels is carrying nuclear weapons, so their stopover in our country does not represent a threat to the region,” the ministry said.

The announcement came a day after US officials said that Washington had been tracking Russian warships and aircraft that were expected to arrive in the Caribbean for a military exercise. They said the exercise would be part of a broader Russian response to US support for Ukraine.

The US officials said that the Russian military presence was notable but not concerning. However, it comes as Russian President Vladimir Putin has suggested that Moscow could take “asymmetrical steps” elsewhere in the world in response to President Joe Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to use US-provided weapons to strike inside Russia to protect Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city.

The unusual deployment of the Russian military so close to the US – particularly the powerful submarine – comes amid major tensions over the war in Ukraine, where the western-backed government is fighting a Russian invasion. The Russian vessels’ visit to Cuba will also overlap with Biden’s visit to the G7 leaders summit in Italy.

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel met with Putin last month for the annual 9 May military parade on Red Square outside the Kremlin.

During the cold war, Cuba was an important client state for the Soviet Union. The deployment of Soviet nuclear missile sites on the island triggered the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, when Washington and Moscow came close to war.

Relations between Russia and Cuba have become closer since a 2022 meeting between Diaz-Canel and Putin.

During the Russian fleet’s arrival at the port of Havana, 21 salvoes will be fired from one of the ships as a salute to the nation, which will be reciprocated by an artillery battery from Cuba’s revolutionary armed forces, the foreign ministry said.

D/C: Here is the Russian news story:

https://www.rt.com/russia/598911-russian-warships-visit-cuba/

RT: Russian warships will arrive in Cuba next week – Havana

The White House sees no “significant national security threat” coming from exercises around the island

Russian warships will arrive in Cuba next week – Havana

Russian frigate Admiral Gorshkov. ©  Sputnik

A group of Russian warships, including a nuclear-powered submarine, will pay an official visit to Cuba next week, Havana’s Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces has announced.

In a statement on Thursday, the ministry said that a total of four Russian vessels, including the frigate Admiral Gorshkov, nuclear-powered submarine Kazan, oil tanker Pashin, and rescue tug Nikolay Chiker, will visit the island from June 12-17.

None of the ships carries nuclear weapons, so their stopover in our country does not pose a threat to the region,” the officials said, adding that the visit to the island, which is around 140km off the coast of the US, “corresponds to the historically friendly relations between Cuba and the Russian Federation and strictly adheres to the international regulations.”

According to the ministry, the Russians will conduct a program of activities during their stay, including courtesy visits to the head of the Revolutionary Navy and the governor of Havana, and visits to places of historical and cultural interest. When the group arrives at the Port of Havana, one of the ships will fire a 21-gun salute, the statement added.

Commenting on the announcement, White House National Security Communications Adviser John Kirby told CNN that while the US will closely follow the visit, it does not anticipate “any significant national security threat as a result of these exercises.” He went on to suggest that the visit – which he described as “not typical” but pre-scheduled – could be Moscow’s signal to Washington that it is “unhappy” with its efforts to support Ukraine.

US Senator Marco Rubio warned that the Russian exercises “should be a wake-up call to the Biden administration.”

“Our adversaries are dangerously close to our shores, and we must be prepared to defend the homeland from military and hybrid threats in our hemisphere,” he wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

In 1962, Cuba became the arena of a major missile crisis that brought the US and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear war. At the time, Moscow stationed nuclear weapons on the island in response to the deployment of American nuclear weapons in Türkiye, and to deter a potential US invasion of Cuba.

The Russian Defense Ministry has yet to comment on the visit, but in late May, it said that a group of warships from the Northern Fleet had set out for the Atlantic on a “long-distance expedition.” It stated that “the main goals of the expedition are to show the flag and ensure the naval presence in operationally important areas of the Far Sea zone.”

D/C: Putin playing chess again!

US long-range missiles to Ukraine reignites German debate

Dmytro Hubenko1 hour ago

The US has said it secretly delivered long-range ATACMS missiles to Ukraine. This has opened new discussion in Germany over providing Taurus cruise missiles, a move the German chancellor continues to oppose.

The announcement by the US on Wednesday that it had already provided Ukraine with long-range missiles reopened an ongoing debate in Germany over the delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Ukrainian forces. 

The US weapons system, called Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), has a range of up to 300 kilometers (180 miles).

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, along with the majority of German lawmakers, have repeatedly refused to send Ukraine long-range Taurus weapons system, arguing that doing so would bring Germany into direct conflict with Russia. 

On Wednesday at a press conference alongside UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, Scholz reiterated his opposition to providing Taurus missiles. 

“My decision will not change,” Scholz said, hours before the US disclosed it had quietly delivered ATACMS as part of an assistance package in March.

An unnamed senior US defense official on Thursday told reporters that delivering Taurus was up to Germany, but that given the US decision on supplying ATACMS, and similar decisions in London and Paris to provide long-range cruise missiles, “we would certainly hope that this could be a factor,” on persuading Germany to change its mind. 

‘It’s time’ to send Taurus to Ukraine, says CDU opposition

Chancellor Scholz’s position has drawn harsh criticism from the conservative opposition CDU/CSU bloc. Others in his ruling coalition, namely the environmentalist Greens and the neoliberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), are also in favor of sending the weapons.

“From my point of view, this is a very long-range weapon,” Scholz told lawmakers in March. “Given the significance of not losing control over targets, this weapon could not be used without the deployment of German soldiers.” 

Scholz again rules out sending Taurus missiles

04:27

Johann Wadephul, CDU deputy chairman in the German parliament responsible for foreign affairs and defense, said his party had been campaigning for months for the delivery of Taurus to Ukraine, but has so far failed to convince Scholz.

“It’s now really the time to send Taurus because they are comparable to the ATACMS systems sent from the US, and they are very much needed in Ukraine,” Wadephul told DW.

The Taurus missiles can make a difference, the politician said. “They have a little bit longer range than the American systems, and they are able to reach their their aims in a very sophisticated way,” he said.

A Taurus cruise missile is displayed in a production facility of its manufacturer, MBDA Deutschland
The Taurus missile can hit targets at a range of 500 kilometers (300 miles)Image: Leonhard Simon/Getty Images

The Taurus KEPD-350 missile is considered one of the Bundeswehr’s most modern weapon systems.

The missile, fired from the air by fighter jets, travels at almost the speed of sound and can strike targets as far as 500 kilometers (310 miles) away.

“It’s not a silver bullet but Ukraine needs to really go deeper, strike deeper into the Russian head ground,” Wadephul said.

Asked about Scholz’s refusal to send Taurus missiles to Ukraine, Wadephul criticized the chancellor’s “stubborn position.”

“To stop a person like [Russian President Vladimir Putin], you need strengths, you need clearness and you need the will to win,” he said.

How important are ATACMS missiles to Ukraine?

Yesterday, a US official said that the long-range ATACMS missiles were used for the first time on April 17 in a strike on a Russian airfield in occupied Crimea, about 65 kilometers (103 miles) from the Ukrainian front lines.

While the precision strikes behind Russian lines can make some Russian positions more vulnerable, the overall strategic value is limited, as Ukraine needs air defense systems to defend against Russian strikes on critical infrastructure, according to Marina Miron, from the Department of War Studies at London’s King’s College.

Miron told DW that ATACMS is an offensive weapon that is well-suited for destroying specific hard targets, such as command posts.

“But given small number of missiles that Ukraine has, they will have to choose the targets very carefully,” Miron added.

She cautioned that ATACMS is only one part of a “very long equation” and Ukrainians continue to lack other essential equipment like artillery shells and air defense systems.

“While Ukraine will try to orchestrate those surgical attacks using the small number of ATACAMS they have at their disposal, the Russians will be pounding critical Ukrainian infrastructure with impunity because Ukraine does not have the necessary air defenses,” she said.

“I don’t think these ATACAMS will change the battlefield dynamics dramatically,” she added

Bundestag votes against Taurus missiles for Kyiv

Written with material from AFP news agency

D/C: I know that most journalists are not mathematicians but

” in a strike on a Russian airfield in occupied Crimea, about 65 kilometers (103 miles) from the Ukrainian front lines.”

But 65K is only about 43 miles .. however 103k is about 65 miles .. press really needs to get this right!!!!

However and more importantly the Russian RT press is almost going ballistic about the American missiles to the point that it is very worrisome. More chess?

Arab News (Saudi): ’No longer a shadow war’: Iran says attack on Israel marks strategic shift

A woman walks past a banner depicting launching missiles bearing the emblem of the Islamic Republic of Iran in central Tehran on April 15, 2024. (AFP)

A woman walks past a banner depicting launching missiles bearing the emblem of the Islamic Republic of Iran in central Tehran on April 15, 2024. (AFP)

https://arab.news/z84de

  • Israel’s military said it intercepted 99 percent of the aerial threats with the help of the United States and other allies, and that the overnight attack caused only minor damage
  • Israel has killed at least 33,797 Palestinians in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory

Updated 14 sec ago

AFP

April 16, 2024 02:48

TEHRAN: Iran’s missile and drone barrage against Israel was the first act of a tough new strategy, Tehran says, warning arch foe Israel that any future attack will spark “a direct and punishing response.”
This spells a dramatic shift from past years in which the Islamic republic and Israel have fought a shadow war of proxy fights and covert operations across the Middle East and sometimes further afield.
Iran from late Saturday launched hundreds of drones and missiles, including from its own territory, directly at Israel, to retaliate for a deadly April 1 strike on Iran’s consulate in Damascus.
Israel’s military said it intercepted 99 percent of the aerial threats with the help of the United States and other allies, and that the overnight attack caused only minor damage.
Iran said it had dealt “heavy blows” to Israel and hailed the operation as “successful.”
“Iran’s victorious… operation means that the era of strategic patience is over,” the Iranian president’s political deputy, Mohammad Jamshidi wrote on X.
“Now the equation has changed. Targeting Iranian personnel and assets by the regime will be met with a direct and punishing response.”
President Ebrahim Raisi said the operation had “opened a new page” and “taught the Zionist enemy (Israel) a lesson.”
Iran said it acted in self-defense after the Damascus strike levelled the consular annexe of its embassy and killed seven members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including two generals.
Western governments denounced Iran’s retaliation as “destabilising the region.”
Iran, however, insisted the attack was “limited” and urged Western nations to “appreciate (its) restraint” toward Israel, especially since the outbreak of the Gaza war on October 7.
Regional tensions have soared amid the Israel-Hamas war which has drawn in Iran-backed armed groups in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen.
Several IRGC members, including senior commanders, have been killed in recent months in strikes in Syria which Iran has also blamed on Israel.

Since the 1979 Islamic revolution, Iran has frequently called for Israel’s destruction and made support for the Palestinian cause a centerpiece of its foreign policy.
But it had refrained from directly striking Israel until Saturday, an attack on a scale which appeared to catch many in the international community by surprise.
For decades, Iran relied on a network of allied groups to exert its influence in the region and to deter Israel and the United States, according to experts.
A 2020 report by the Washington Institute said that Tehran had adopted a policy of “strategic patience,” which had “served it well since the inception of the Islamic republic in 1979.”
Former moderate president Hassan Rouhani was a staunch defender of the strategy, especially following Washington’s 2018 withdrawal from a landmark nuclear deal, advocating for Tehran not to take immediate countermeasures and taking a longer view.
Even after the 2020 US killing of Qasem Soleimani, an IRGC commander revered in Iran, Tehran gave prior warning to Washington, US sources said, before it launched missiles against two American bases in Iraq, and no soldiers were killed in the attack.
After Saturday’s attack on Israel, Guards chief Hossein Salami also said Iran was “creating a new equation.”
“Should the Zionist regime attack our interests, our assets, our personnel and citizens at any point, we will counterattack it from the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he was quoted as saying by local media.
The attack was also hailed as a “historic” success by Iranian media, with the government-run newspaper Iran saying the offensive “has created a new power equation in the region.”
The ultra-conservative daily Javan said the attack was “an experience Iran needed, to know how to act in future battles” and that it would make Israel “think long before (committing) any crime” against Tehran.
The reformist Ham Mihan newspaper said the attack “ended the status quo and broke the rules of the conflict that pitted the two sides against each other for 20 years and pushed the situation into another phase.”
“This is no longer a shadow war,” it said.

D/C: This is not going away!! One doubts how much control the Iranian government has over the IRGC.

https://mark3ds.wordpress.com/?s=IRGC

BBC:Ukraine’s power plants at the mercy of Russian missiles

2 hours ago

By Sarah Rainsford,Eastern Europe correspondent in Kharkiv

Reuters A destroyed power facility in KharkivReutersBarely any of Ukraine’s power plants have escaped Russia’s drone and missile attacks

Russia’s war on Ukraine has entered a new phase. Drone and missile attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure are now frequent and massive, overwhelming its current air defences.

They often include the same Iranian-made Shahed drones just launched by Tehran at Israel. President Volodymyr Zelensky said their sound, whether in the skies over the Middle East or in Europe “must serve as a wake-up call to the free world”.

Officials in Ukraine say they can “count on one hand” the thermal and hydro power plants across the country that are not yet badly damaged or totally destroyed.

Last week, a major facility close to Kyiv was hit. To the northeast, in Ukraine’s second city Kharkiv, all three major power plants are in ruins. DTEK, a private energy company, has revealed it’s operating at less than 20% capacity after repeated missile strikes.

As Ukraine scrambles to repair what it can, and keep the electricity flowing to homes and industry, it is issuing increasingly urgent calls for outside help. The Russian assault has not stopped.

The red-and-white striped chimneys of Kharkiv’s Thermal Power Plant No.5 are still visible from miles away. Approach a little closer, and the destruction beneath is revealed. The main building has a huge hole blown through the heart of it. All around is a mess of blackened metal and smashed concrete.

Power plant destruction

Kharkiv’s Thermal Power Plant No.5 has seen devastating damage from Russian strikes

The attack on 22 March was deliberate and devastating. Five Russian missiles struck the same spot, mangling turbines, generators and transformers and taking the plant offline. A week later, Russia targeted the city’s power plants again.

For Ihor Orlovskiy this feels personal.

“It’s like looking at the ruins of your own home. It brings pain and tears,” the deputy director says, leading me across chunks of metal and stone to the spot where the missiles exploded.

He’s worked here since Soviet times.

“It’s a very bitter feeling. But this mobilises us too, to build back. Because we know a city of more than a million people is depending on us.”

There have been six attacks on this plant since the start of the full-scale invasion, but the one in March was the worst by far.

It was also the most demoralising: it took engineers a full year to repair one section of the plant, then two weeks after it was restarted Russia hit exactly the same spot.

Other industry sources tell similar stories of increasingly accurate strikes. In the past, they say, missiles would fall short or cause less damage.

That leads some to suspect Russian agents inside Ukraine are feeding information to Moscow: the power plants cover vast territory and the damage, or repairs, are impossible to conceal.

But Russia already knows where to target.

The heavy machinery dates back to the USSR, there are still Soviet labels on the ruins, and Moscow has the old blueprints of the plants.

Ihor Orlovskiy suspects the increased precision is more likely down to the sheer intensity of recent attacks. “When you launch five, six, seven missiles at the same spot, some are bound to hit.”

Ihor Orlovskiy, the power plant department boss

Ihor Orlovskiy believes the increased precision of the attacks is down to their sheer intensity

In the fields all around there are giant electricity pylons. But since March there’s been nothing flowing along the lines from Power Plant No.5, or Kharkiv’s other thermal power plants.

The city has to bring in power from western Ukraine, which means limited supply and regular blackouts. The Russians have targeted electricity substations too.

Local authorities are scrambling to minimise the impact and reduce the time homes and businesses are left in the dark. Residents have learned to charge their devices, and multiple power banks, as soon as the electricity comes on. They also keep reserves of water for drinking and washing.

The Kharkiv metro is back working, albeit in fits and starts, and so are the traffic lights. But with an unreliable power supply that could get worse, businesses are creating their own solutions.

Kharkiv is a major publishing hub and Oleksandr Popovich, the boss of a large printing firm, says for weeks they have been relying on three generators.

Kharkiv by night

Kharkiv’s power supply is currently limited so there are regular blackouts

Early in the war a missile hit 100m (330ft) from the main production line.

“It destroyed all our storage and 10 tonnes of paper. But a tough day only makes us tougher,” says Mr Popovich, radiating the spirit of defiance and determination that has become Kharkiv’s trademark.

“Unfortunately, I can’t fix the electricity,” he says.

“But everyone has to do their own job. Mine is to produce books until our victory. We must keep working. We must give people in Ukraine the chance to read new books.”

The firm did consider relocating further away from the Russian border, but they decided to stay and have even invested in increasing production.

Now that Russia is targeting Kharkiv with renewed focus he admits to worrying: “Then I think about our army. Our soldiers need to know they are not defending empty cities. They are defending cities with people.”

Printing company boss

Oleksandr Popovich says his large printing firm must keep working to provide Ukrainians with books

Dozens of his own staff have signed up to fight. The photograph of one, killed in action on the eastern front line, hangs beside the main entrance.

Reports from the front are now sobering.

Ukraine’s commander-in-chief, Gen Oleksander Syrskyi, said at the weekend the situation along sections of the front line had “significantly worsened”.

Warmer weather and firmer ground were helping Russia launch assaults in armoured vehicles and put Ukrainian forces under renewed pressure, he wrote on Telegram.

Fighting around Chasiv Yar in the Donbas is especially intense. The general believes Russia wants to take the territory by 9 May, a symbolic date when Moscow celebrates the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany.

Gen Syrskyi described the “heroic” efforts of his troops in “holding back the enemy’s daily attacks”. But he also mentioned the need to improve their “moral and psychological” state.

After more than two years, they are exhausted. But when MPs in Kyiv finally voted on a new law regulating how men are mobilised, the amendment setting a limit for how long they have to fight had been removed.

Against the larger army of its enemy, Ukraine needs all the soldiers it can muster.

The slip in morale is compounded by a shortage of ammunition now reaching the front lines and the continuing failure of the US Congress to approve a critical package of aid for Kyiv.

Ukraine’s troops, like everyone here, sense their war sliding down the international agenda.

And now there’s new cause for dismay, as many note the difference in response to the escalating crisis in the Middle East.

Israel has had direct support to protect its skies from Iranian missiles and drones, even as the same countries limit their help to Ukraine which is under Russian attack every day.

President Zelensky hinted at the frustration in his condemnation of Iran’s actions.

“The world cannot wait for discussions to go on,” Ukraine’s president wrote on Twitter, or X. “Words do not stop drones and do not intercept missiles. Only tangible assistance does. The assistance we are anticipating.”

Germany has just promised to send an additional Patriot air defence unit to Ukraine “immediately”. Thanking Chancellor Olaf Scholz for the support at a “critical moment”, Volodymyr Zelensky urged other countries to follow suit.

The staff of Kharkiv’s power plant No.5 would welcome the protection.

Repeat attacks

“We’d only just repaired things, and now we have to start all over again,” a worker called Yury told me. “We will sort it, but the main thing is not to get hit again!”

As he and others assess the damage, salvage what they can and draw up a plan for rebuilding, they face numerous air raid sirens every day.

Yury who complains about repeat work

Yury says the team had only just finished repairing the plant when it was hit again

There are two kinds of alert, a fire safety officer explains. If the threat seems focused around the border, about 40km (25 miles) away, some keep working.

“But if we see there’s a rocket risk for Kharkiv then there’s an announcement: ‘Urgent! To the shelter immediately!’,” he says.

That slows the recovery work and it shatters the nerves. Any missile fired at Kharkiv will hit within seconds, and the staff are surrounded by stark evidence of the danger.

But it’s not just the engineers and construction teams back at work.

When we arrived at the plant, a group of women were out cleaning the paths, painting the kerb, even pulling up dandelions around the main entrance.

A little later I found them down in the shelter during another air raid.

“Life goes on, and we still need to keep things nice,” said one woman, despite the entire power plant being in tatters.

“We like to keep things clean and in order. It’s our job. But it’s also good for the spirit!”

Women who clean and weed and paint at the power plant, sit in a bunker

A group of women who work at the plant still spend time cleaning the area in order to keep morale up

The women had also painted the underground shelter in a fresh “salad” green, adding a splash of cheer to a Cold War-era bunker built to withstand nuclear attack by the West.

Instead it protects Ukrainians from ballistic missiles launched by their neighbour.

“They say it’s so we surrender, that they want to frighten us into running from here,” another woman chips in as the air raid ends and she prepares to head back up to work.

“They want us to leave Kharkiv. But we won’t do that.”

D/C: Russia taking full advantage of the Iran-Israel crisis. Great pity Ukraine does not have the same military support and equipment that Israel has! Without power can Ukraine even create new armaments? Looking very grim without immediate aid!

Aljazeera: Tensions rise amid expectations of Iran retaliation against Israel

Tehran says UN Security Council should have condemned Israel’s deadly air raid on Iranian consulate in Damascus.

An ambulance is parked outside the Iranian embassy after a suspected Israeli strike on Monday on Iran's consulate, adjacent to the main Iranian embassy building, which Iran said had killed seven military personnel including two key figures in the Quds Force, in the Syrian capital Damascus
Iran has promised a response after its consulate in the Syrian capital Damascus was destroyed in a suspected Israeli missile attack [Firas Makdesi/Reuters]

By Al Jazeera Staff

Published On 11 Apr 2024

Iran’s mission to the United Nations has suggested that any Iranian military response to a deadly Israeli air raid on the Iranian consulate in Damascus could have been averted if the UN Security Council had denounced Israel’s attack.

The Iranian statement on Thursday comes amid a growing number of media reports that an Iranian attack on Israel or Israeli interests is imminent.

“Had the UN Security Council condemned the Zionist regime’s reprehensible act of aggression on our diplomatic premises in Damascus and subsequently brought to justice its perpetrators, the imperative for Iran to punish this rogue regime might have been obviated,” the Iranian mission said in a social media post.

Iran has promised to carry out a “decisive” response to the Israeli attack that killed seven members of its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including two generals, in Damascus on April 1.

The Israeli assault and anticipated Iranian retaliation have raised fears of an all-out regional war in the Middle East amid the raging conflict in Gaza, intensifying tensions and a chorus of calls for de-escalation.

Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian held phone calls with his Qatari, Saudi, Emirati, Iraqi and German counterparts on Thursday.

Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock cautioned against further tensions during her talks with Amir-Abdollahian, Berlin said.

“Avoiding further regional escalation must be in everyone’s interest. We urge all actors in the region to act responsibly and exercise maximum restraint,” the German Federal Foreign Office said in a post on X.

German airline Lufthansa extended its suspension on flights to Tehran on Thursday, the Reuters news agency cited a company spokesperson as saying.

Russia also warned its citizens against travelling to the Middle East, especially Israel, the Palestinian territory and Lebanon.

The United States, which has forces stationed across the region, had warned Iran against attacking Israel, pledging support for its ally.

“Our commitment to Israel’s security against these threats from Iran and its proxies is ironclad; let me say it again: ironclad,” US President Joe Biden said on Wednesday. “We’re going to do all we can to protect Israel’s security.”

A US official, who spoke to Al Jazeera Arabic on condition of anonymity, said Biden’s statement is not merely rhetorical, and the US would help intercept Iranian rockets or drones against Israel.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken spoke via phone to Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on Wednesday.

“Secretary Blinken reiterated the United States’ support for Israel’s security and made clear that the US will stand with Israel against any threats by Iran and its proxies,” the US Department of State said in a statement.

Blinken also spoke to his Turkish, Chinese and Saudi counterparts, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said on Thursday.

“We have been engaged in a series of contacts not just at his [Blinken’s] level – but other levels, too – to talk to foreign counterparts to send this really clear message to Iran that they should not escalate this conflict,” Miller said.

The New York Times reported, citing anonymous Pentagon sources that Michael E Kurilla, the top US general in the Middle East, was visiting Israel on Thursday to discuss the possible Iranian attack.

Later on Thursday, White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre reiterated that the US is committed to Israel’s security without providing details on how Washington would respond to an Iranian strike. “I want to be really careful. I am not going to get into operational procedures from here,” she told reporters.

Iran hawks in the US Congress have been calling for a strong response by Washington to any Iranian military move against Israel.

“Israel is under threat of imminent attack by Iran,” Republican Senator Tom Cotton wrote in a social media post on Thursday. “President Biden needs to warn the ayatollahs immediately that the United States will back Israel to the hilt and the joint American-Israeli retaliation for any attack will be swift and devastating.”

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.633.0_en.html#goog_1722503247

Video Duration 01 minutes 28 seconds 01:28

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to issue a threat to Iran and other adversaries, saying that the country is prepared for “challenges in other arenas” beyond the war on Gaza.

“We have determined a simple rule: Whoever harms us, we will harm them. We are prepared to meet all of the security needs of the State of Israel, both defensively and offensively,” Netanyahu said during a visit to an airbase in central Israel, according to his office.

The Israeli military has been attacking Iran-linked targets in Syria for years as Tehran deepened its military presence in the war-torn country.

But the attack on the Iranian diplomatic facility in Damascus earlier this month was seen as especially brazen. It garnered condemnations from across the Middle East and the rest of the world.

“The consulate and embassy offices in any country are considered to be the territory of that country. When they attack our consulate, it means they have attacked our territory,” Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was quoted as saying by Mehr news agency on Wednesday.

“The Zionist regime made a mistake and must be punished and will be punished.”

Source: Al Jazeera

D/C: https://mark3ds.wordpress.com/?s=irgc

And for those of you who do not mind reading RT

https://www.rt.com/news/595715-iran-israel-imminent-strike

Aljazeera: At gunpoint, Ukrainians in occupied regions vote in Russia’s election

Ukrainians and a rights group say people are being coerced to vote by their occupiers in election dismissed as a sham.

Members of a local electoral commission work at a mobile polling station during the early voting in Russia’s presidential election, in the course of Russia-Ukraine conflict in Mariupol, Russian-controlled Ukraine, March 13, 2024. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko
Voting in the Russian presidential election is taking place outside Russia’s borders in occupied areas like Mariupol, Ukraine, as Moscow’s invasion drags on into a third year [Alexander Ermochenko/Reuters]

By Mansur Mirovalev

Published On 16 Mar 202416 Mar 2024

Since February 25, women with name tags and huge stacks of papers have been knocking on every door in the Russia-occupied parts of four Ukrainian regions or approaching residents outside their apartment buildings or houses.

The documents are lists of voters, and the women and, rarely, men are election officials who usually teach in nearby schools, accept utilities payments or work as government clerks.

They ask residents for their IDs and nudge them to fill in an early ballot form with the names of four candidates in Russia’s presidential election, current and former residents of the occupied areas told Al Jazeera.

One of the candidates is Vladimir Putin, who is all but certain to win his fifth election, and the remaining three presidential hopefuls are figureheads from pro-Kremlin parties whose participation is widely understood by observers as an attempt to create an illusion of choice.

The Ukrainians rarely refuse to fill in the ballot for a very persuasive reason – a masked, gun-toting Russian serviceman towering next to the official and a car filled with more armed men nearby, Al Jazeera has learned.

The “voting” usually takes place near the entrance of an apartment, and the election official along with the armed soldier can see whose name is ticked off on the ballot.

“There’s no secrecy of vote,” a former resident of Mariupol told Al Jazeera, speaking about how her friends and relatives voted on Wednesday.

“People who love Ukraine must submit to the regime and pretend they support everything that’s going on because they’re afraid for their lives.”

She added, however, that there are resistance groups that largely consist of young people who leak information about the numbers and location of Russian soldiers and weaponry to Ukrainian intelligence services.

Some locals hope that their participation in the vote will give them a literal free pass out of the occupied area.

“My father-in-law had a heart attack and died. My mother-in-law’s hair turned grey because of what we had gone through. All we want is to leave and never look back,” Tatyana, who lives in the port of Berdiansk in southern Ukraine, which was occupied in late February 2022, told Al Jazeera.

She and her husband voted early, on Monday, unsurprisingly for Putin because they don’t want to be blacklisted by Russia-appointed authorities.

They plan to cross into southern Russia and take a plane to Kazakhstan, where their relatives agreed to shelter them.

https://52f1052da0a01b1f2fc77bac5daafcb3.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

The few Ukrainians who refused to vote or badmouthed the election have been rounded up and taken to “basements”, as informal prisons are known in Russia-occupied parts of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions, according to the Eastern Human Rights Group, a Ukrainian watchdog.

The rights group and the three Ukrainians Al Jazeera interviewed for this article, whose full names will not be used for safety reasons, reported the threat of guns at polling stations in the occupied regions.

So the only way to safely say “no” is to keep the door closed to election officials and avoid the polling stations that opened on Friday, the first day of Russia’s three-day election.

“Nobody touches” those who stay at home, said a former resident of the Russia-occupied southern town of Enerhodar who fled to Kyiv but is in constant contact with her family and friends at home.

The reason is simple – vote-rigging, which has been documented in Russia in previous elections and is widely expected to be even more pronounced in the occupied parts of Ukraine.

“I think the turnout will be 120 to 150 percent,” the former resident quipped.

Observers agreed – and said Kremlin-appointed officials will compete with each other in vote rigging to report large turnouts and a big percentage of votes for Putin.

“At the pseudo-elections, there will be maximal vote-rigging because local ‘viceroys’ will try to surpass the ‘Chechen count,’” Kyiv-based analyst Aleksey Kushch told Al Jazeera, referring to the nearly 100 percent turnouts and pro-Putin votes in Chechnya.

Moscow-appointed “viceroys” openly urge residents of the occupied regions to vote for Putin.

“I’m confident that the activity of our citizens will be high and every resident of the region will vote for our president,” the Russia-installed governor of Zaporizhia, Yevgeny Balitsky, said on Telegram.

On Friday morning, Russian officials reported the early vote turnout – 45 percent in the occupied part of Zaporizhia and 58 percent in the Donetsk and Kherson regions.

The RIA Novosti news agency filed the report at 8:05am (06:05 GMT), five minutes after polling stations opened in public schools and government buildings in the occupied regions.

The election provides the Kremlin with an opportunity to create an illusion for state-controlled media and their Russian audience.

“The authorities formed groups of people who gladly pose for videos to provide a pretty picture. They don’t need to force anyone to go voting. No one is going to riot, get angry,” the former Enerhodar resident said.

Russia permits voting even for those who haven’t yet obtained red Russian passports in a blatant violation of its own election laws.

Wannabe voters can present any valid ID, including a Ukrainian passport or driving license.

Moscow announced strict security measures amid what they call Ukraine’s “information diversions”.

It says Ukrainian intelligence services fish for voters’ information and send threats to election officials.

The threats “look copied and pasted. Only some words are changed” in each of them, Vladimir Vysotsky, chief election official in the Russia-occupied part of the Donetsk region, told the Itar-Tass news agency.

“For the first time, we are holding elections in such a complicated, extreme situation, when such a toxic international situation is created with constant threats and a mass of other negative things,” Russia’s chief election official, Ella Pamfilova, said on Thursday.

https://52f1052da0a01b1f2fc77bac5daafcb3.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Meanwhile, Ukrainian observers wonder aloud about the necessity of elections in Russia, where Putin has become the longest-serving leader since Soviet ruler Joseph Stalin.

“The deep split within the totalitarian reality is manifested through the way Putin fanatically clings to the necessity of extending his endless cadences through ‘election’ while fully neutering the very essence of competition and open ending,” said Svetlana Chunikhina, vice president of the Association of Political Psychologists, a group in Kyiv.

“In Russia, they consider elections as the most prestigious way to legitimise power,” she told Al Jazeera. “But totalitarian reality doesn’t generate any prestige. It only generates fear and submissiveness.”

Kyiv predictably lambasted the vote in the occupied areas.

“The campaign to imitate a presidential election shows Russia’s further insolent disregard for the standards and principles of international law,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement on Thursday.

D/C; Democracy in action, why does Putin even bother!!

DW: Ukraine updates: Russia ready for nuclear war, Putin says

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons in the event of a threat to the state. Meanwhile, a drone reportedly hit a national security building in Russia. DW has the latest.

What you need to know

Russia’s president reiterated that his country will respond if there is a threat to its statehood, sovereignty or independence.

The blunt warning to the West comes ahead of a presidential vote this week that Putin is expected to win.

Putin praised US President Joe Biden as a veteran politician who fully understands the possible dangers of escalation.

In other related news, the leaders of France and Poland will meet German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Berlin on Friday for talks on Ukraine.

Here’s a look at the latest developments in Russia’s war in Ukraine for Wednesday, March 13:Skip next section Germany to host French, Polish leaders for talks on Ukraine

5 hours ago5 hours ago

Germany to host French, Polish leaders for talks on Ukraine

On Friday, the leaders of France, Germany and Poland will hold talks on Ukraine in Berlin aimed at helping organize further aid for Kyiv.

“In my opinion, these three capitals have the task and the power to mobilize all of Europe” to provide Ukraine with fresh aid, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told state broadcaster TVP late Tuesday from Washington DC. 

Friday’s talks come as European countries rally support for Ukraine, which continues to need vast amounts of weapons and ammunition in its ongoing resistance of Russia’s invasion, which has entered its third year. 

“We must do everything we can to organize as much support as possible for Ukraine,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz told a press conference alongside Thai premier Srettha Thavisin Wednesday in Berlin.

Germany is Ukraine’s largest European provider of military aid, but Chancellor Scholz is holding back on providing long-range Taurus missiles to Ukraine, which could reach far into Russian territory. 

Ahead of Friday’s trilateral sit-down, which will include Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Chancellor Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron will have a bilateral meeting, said Scholz’s spokesman Steffen Hebestreit. The missile issue has been a source of tension between Scholz and Macron, who has urged allies not to be “cowards” in supporting Ukraine.

Scholz again rules out sending Taurus missiles

https://p.dw.com\\/p/4dU9v

Moscow warns NATO members that war could spin out of control

Russia has warned that the war in Ukraine could expand geographically and spin out of control because of the “provocative actions” of individual NATO nations.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Moscow felt the West was walking “on the edge of the abyss” and pushing the world closer to the chasm with its actions over Ukraine, in response to a question from the Reuters news agency.

“This conflict is already underway, and has been going on for more than one year,” Zakharova said. “It’s not so much about the risks of this confrontation, but about the risks of an open, hot phase.”

Zakharova also said the West should abandon the idea of strategically defeating Russia

Kyiv’s volunteers warn border region Russians to leave

Volunteer Russian forces fighting alongside Ukrainians against the Kremlin have urged civilians to flee border areas such as Belgorod and Kursk as they plan large-scale attacks on military targets there. 

Groups of volunteer fighters, made up of Russians who oppose President Vladimir Putin, said this week they had crossed from Ukraine into Russia and captured a village in the Kursk region.

“We are forced to inflict shelling on military positions that are stationed in the cities of Belgorod and Kursk,” three groups — the Freedom of Russia Legion, the Russian Volunteer Corps, and Sibir — said in a joint statement.

“We call on the local authorities to preserve human lives and begin evacuating the cities of Kursk and Belgorod,” they added.

Moscow denies that the fighters had gained territory and says it has repelled all incursions.
The Ukraine-based militias have claimed to have been behind previous incursions into Russian territory.

Pro-Ukraine Russian militia fights against Kremlin

https://p.dw.com/p/4dT5c

Moscow sends troops to border with Finland

Russian President Vladimir Putin said additional troops and weapons systems would be stationed on the country’s northwestern border with new NATO member Finland. 

The announcement came as the Russian leader also warned that Moscow is technically ready for nuclear war.

In an interview on Russian state television, Putin said Finland’s joining NATO was an “absolutely senseless step” that did not align with its national interests. 

Both Finland and Sweden applied for membership in the military alliance after Russia staged its all-out invasion of Ukraine more than two years ago. Both countries are now members.

What does NATO gain from Sweden and Sweden gain from NATO?

https://p.dw.com/p/4dT36

Putin says Russia ready, not willing, for nuclear war

Russian President Vladimir Putin says Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons if there is a threat to his country’s statehood, sovereignty or independence. 

In an interview with Russian state television released early Wednesday, Putin delivered a blunt warning to the West: “The nations that say they have no red lines regarding Russia should realize that Russia won’t have any red lines regarding them either.”

He added that “no one should have any doubts that a direct attack on our country will lead to defeat and horrible consequences for any potential aggressor.”

Putin said Russia’s nuclear triad — nuclear weapons delivered by land, sea and air — was “much more” advanced than those in the West.

“Our triad, the nuclear triad, it is more modern than any other triad,” he said. “Only we and the Americans actually have such triads. And we have advanced much more here,” 

The Russian leader has repeatedly spoken about his readiness to use nuclear weapons since launching the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.  

Putin praised US President Joe Biden as someone who fully understands the possible dangers of nuclear escalation, and said he doesn’t think that the world is heading to a nuclear war.

In his state-of-the-nation address last month, Putin warned the West that deepening its involvement in the fighting in Ukraine would risk a nuclear war.

Putin warns of nuclear war if NATO troops sent to Ukraine

https://p.dw.com/p/4dSXT

Weimar Triangle leaders to meet over Ukraine

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has said France, Germany and Poland are set to hold emergency talks on Ukraine in Berlin on Friday. 

The summit of the Weimar Triangle, a format of the three countries that was initially created in 1991, was described as an “emergency and unplanned.”

Tusk made his announcement after discussions about Ukraine in Washington. 

Poland is among Ukraine’s strongest allies and has repeatedly urged its Western partners to increase military aid spending for Kyiv to fend off the Russian invasions.

Ukraine strike hits Russian security building

Russia’s TASS news agency says a Ukrainian drone hit a building used by the FSB state security service in the city of Belgorod. 

The news comes as a wave of drone strikes targeted Russia’s oil refineries and border regions for the second day in a row on Wednesday. 

One of the drones sparked a fire and injured several people in the Ryazan region, officials said.

While dozens of drones were launched overnight, regional governors said the vast majority were shot down causing some damage but no victims. 

Russia said the drones were aimed at the Belgorod, Bryansk, Kursk, and Voronezh regions.

rc/sms (AFP, AP, dpa, Reuters)

ABC: Wartime footage, anger with Seoul, and a gift from Vladimir Putin: Is North Korea (actually) planning to go to war?

By Jenny Cai with wires 

Close up of Kim Jong Un speaking at a podium
The shift in rhetoric from North Korea’s Kim Jong Un has some experts tabling the possibility that a conflict might be imminent.(AP Photo: KCNA)

Beyond firing artillery rounds into the sea and launching spy satellites, North Korea has been busy removing references and images of reunification with South Korea from its state-run websites, creating alarm among experts.

The moves are the latest concrete evidence that the country’s leader, Kim Jong Un, might be implementing a pledge made in January where he called South Korea a “primary foe” and concluded that reunification was no longer possible.

Pyongyang’s decision to abandon the decades-long goal of reunification — in addition to rekindled relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin — has contributed to escalating tensions on the Korean Peninsula, to a degree that has some experts tabling the possibility that conflict might be imminent.

Here’s a look at what’s led to the current situation, how experts are interpreting the shifts in rhetoric amid the current global context, and whether or not yet another conflict might genuinely be on the brink of breaking out.

What has been going on?

A photo mosaic showing missiles firing and people at war.
North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency released photos this week showing field training exercises at an undisclosed location.(AFP: KCNA via KNS)

The initial bombshell came when Mr Kim called for a rewriting of the country’s constitution to eliminate the idea of a peaceful reunification with South Korea — and to cement Seoul as an “invariable principal enemy” — in a speech to the Supreme People’s Assembly earlier this year.

During his speech, Mr Kim blamed South Korea and the United States for raising tensions in the region, citing their expanded joint military exercises, deployments of US strategic military assets, and their trilateral security cooperation with Japan as turning the peninsula into a dangerous war-prone zone.

Following Mr Kim’s speech, the North’s assembly abolished key government agencies that have been instrumental to decades of exchanges with Seoul.

Satellite imagery of Pyongyang showed that a major monument in the capital that symbolised the goal of reconciliation with South Korea was destroyed after the speech.

A monument of two women holding hands together in North Korea.
Satellite imagery revealed that North Korea demolished a major monument in its capital that symbolised the goal of reconciliation with South Korea.(Reuters: Yuri Maltsev)

South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency reported that articles containing unification references have consistently been removed from North Korea’s platforms and messaging: for example, a red-coloured logo of the Korean Peninsula has been removed from the North’s official Foreign Trade site banners

Mr Kim’s remarks were made amid escalating tensions on the peninsula.

Tensions between North and South Korea

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un says his country will no longer pursue reconciliation with South Korea, calling for rewriting the North’s constitution to eliminate the idea of shared statehood between the war-divided countries, according to state media.

Close up of Kim Jong Un speaking at a podium

Since January, the North has fired hundreds of artillery shells into the sea near the disputed maritime border with the South and tested what it said was a solid-fuel missile fitted with a hypersonic warhead.

Last month, the North’s state media reported that the Supreme People’s Assembly had voted to scrap all agreements with its neighbour aimed at promoting economic cooperation.

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol criticised this move to define his country as hostile, saying it showed Pyongyang’s “anti-national and ahistorical” nature.

Seoul has also ramped up joint military exercises with Japan and the US focused on countering the North’s potential use of nuclear weapons, which Mr Kim has portrayed as invasion rehearsals. 

What’s the significance and how are experts interpreting it?

A TV shows and Asian newsreader reporting a rocket launch as people sit in a room and watch
Both North and South Korea have ramped up military exercises amid rising tensions. (AP Photo: Ahn Young-joon)

Since the 1950-53 Korean War ended in a stalemate, both Koreas have had policies that treat each other differently than other countries.

That included relying on special agencies and ministries for inter-Korean relations rather than their foreign ministries, and embracing policies for a future peaceful reunification, usually envisioning a single state with two systems.

North Korea warns to expect more nuclear weapons in 2024

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un sets economic, military and foreign policy goals for the coming year.

A close up of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un giving a speech.

Colin Alexander, a senior lecturer of political communication at Nottingham Trent University, said scrapping the rhetoric of reunification is a “strategic observation the North has made about politics in the South”.

“South Korea has oscillated between being more inclined towards reunification and [then] moving really far away from it,” he said.

While South Korea’s former president Moon Jae-In pushed for greater dialogue with the North, the current conservative government led by Mr Yoon took a much harder stance towards its neighbour.

“My interpretation is that North Korea is interpreting this inconsistency with a lot of frustration … and what they realise is [reunification] is so unachievable within the present outlook, that they must move towards a policy which is more realistic.”

Ankit Panda, an expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, also recently said that the North has been recalibrating its regional approach since the collapse of the 2019 Hanoi summit

A photo of a Russian Aurus limousine.
Vladimir Putin gifted Kim Jong Un a luxury Russian-made limousine — an Aurus — last month.(AP Photo: Sergei Guneyev/File)

“But now, with advanced nuclear and missile capabilities — and the support of Russia and China — Mr Kim feels confident enough to make these changes, which amount to his most consequential proclamations on external affairs since taking power in North Korea,” Mr Panda said.

Russia and North Korea have forged closer ties since Mr Kim and Mr Putin met in September last year and pledged to promote exchanges in all areas as their respective international isolation has deepened over Russia’s war in Ukraine and the North’s ongoing nuclear weapons developments.

As a symbol of their rekindled ties, Mr Putin recently gifted Mr Kim with a Russian-made Aurus luxury limousine — the same type of car Mr Putin is often seen riding around in himself.

Could the situation lead to war?

A man holding a gun amid soldiers.
A photo — released this week — of Kim Jong Un inspecting field training exercises. (Reuters: Korean Central News Agency)

Rising tensions between Pyongyang and Seoul have led many experts to scramble to speculate over the last few months on what sorts of scenarios may lie ahead. 

In a report published on the US-based 38 North project, former State Department official Robert Carlin and nuclear scientist Siegfried Hecker said the situation on the peninsula was “more dangerous than it has been at any time since early June 1950”, shortly before the start of the Korean War.

The authors added in no uncertain terms that they believe Mr Kim “has made a strategic decision to go to war” and that “the danger is already far beyond the routine warnings in Washington, Seoul and Tokyo about Pyongyang’s ‘provocations'”.

Is South Korea’s plan to scare Kim working?

While its northern rival has a nuclear vessel at its disposal, South Korea is relying on another strategy to scare its neighbours: an elite special forces operation unit trained to work behind enemy lines. Here’s how it works.

Kim Jong Un leans over a table, looking through a magnifier as he points a gun.

Hong Min, a senior researcher at the Korea Institute for National Unification in Seoul, added that the policy changes could be perceived as helping North Korea justify using nuclear weapons against the South, as it has increasingly threatened in recent years.

“If they give up on peaceful unification and redefine South Korea as a hostile enemy country with no diplomatic relations, the contradiction of using nuclear weapons against the same people will be eliminated,” Mr Hong said.

But other analysts, as well as officials in Washington and Seoul, say they have spotted no serious signs Pyongyang intends to take imminent military action.

For example, South Korean Defence Minister Shin Won-sik wrote off the claims of increasing risk of war during a recent radio interview as “excessive exaggeration”, adding that such interpretations play into the hands of North Korea’s psychological warfare.

Two missiles on display with a crowd in the background.
North Korea often displays its missiles in military parades. (AP: Korean Central News Agency)

Dr Alexander added that Mr Kim’s war threats should also be understood in the context of the North’s culture where “national prestige is built around military issues”.

“Because of this propaganda concept North Korean government created domestically, it leads them to having to consistently discuss the military and its readiness [for war].”

But North Korea does not have a “rationale” to actually start a war, Dr Alexander said.

“[Because] if North Korea were to attack the South or anywhere else, there will be significant negative consequences for it.”

D/C: Older posts below. Extremely worrisome situation,

https://mark3ds.wordpress.com/?s=north+korea

RT(Russia): NATO applicant’s breakaway region asks Moscow for help 28 Feb, 2024 18:26

Plus: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/29/transnistria-moldova-breakaway-region-russia-protection-appeal

Russia has pledged to address Transnistria’s plea, while Moldova has condemned the call as a “propaganda declaration”

NATO applicant’s breakaway region asks Moscow for help

The 7th congress of Transnistrian legislators at all levels in Tiraspol on February 28, 2024. ©  Sputnik / Artem Kulekin

Transnistria, an unrecognized republic that split from Moldova in the early 1990s, asked Russia on Wednesday for help amid mounting pressure from Chisinau, which it describes as an “economic blockade.”

The call for help was made at a congress of Transnistrian legislators at all levels, which adopted a declaration on the matter. The lawmakers asked Moscow to take “measures to protect Transnistria amid mounting pressure from Moldova,” stressing that nearly half of the 450,000 people living in the unrecognized country are Russian citizens.

“We’ve asked to intensify political and diplomatic measures, since the Russian Federation is one of the international mediators in the settlement process,” the self-declared republic’s foreign minister, Vitaly Ignatyev, explained while speaking to the broadcaster Rossiya 24.

The congress also raised the issue of the “economic blockade” with the UN Secretary General, OSCE, the EU parliament, and other international bodies and organizations, urging them to put pressure on Chisinau.

Moscow promptly reacted to the call for help, promising to address it shortly. “Protecting the interests of Transnistria residents, our compatriots, is one of our priorities. All requests are always carefully considered,” Russia’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

The Russian parliament will evaluate the Transnistrian plea as soon as the document actually reaches Moscow, Konstantin Zatulin, a senior lawmaker with the lower chamber, the State Duma, told RIA Novosti.

The move has already been condemned by Moldova, with the country’s Vice PM on Reintegration, Oleg Serebyan, dismissing Tiraspol’s call as “propaganda” and denying putting the breakaway territory under an “economic blockade.”

“The Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration and the Bureau for Reintegration Policies of the Moldovan Government firmly dismiss propagandistic statements from Tiraspol. They emphasize that the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova enjoys peace, security, and economic integration policies with the European Union,” Serebyan said in a statement.

Transnistria, a narrow strip of land between the left bank of the Dniester rover and Ukraine, proclaimed independence from Chisinau in the early 1990s, shortly after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Following Chisinau’s botched attempt to reclaim the territory by force, a ceasefire was reached in 1992, with Russia maintaining a small peacekeeping force in the region. Over the years, Tiraspol has taken multiple steps to integrate with Moscow, with the republic’s population overwhelmingly backing the idea to join Russia in the mid-2000s.

D/C: This release from Russian press RT is very troubling, What next?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/29/transnistria-moldova-breakaway-region-russia-protection-appeal

https://mark3ds.wordpress.com/?s=Moldova

https://mark3ds.wordpress.com/2024/02/23/self-proclaimed-transnistrian-mps-in-moldova-prepare-to-address-putin-and-ask-to-be-integrated-into-russia